NPU vs GPU: The Battle for Dominance in Generative AI

npu vs gpuf

NPU vs. GPU: that’s the interesting question in the realm of generative AI today. What are the differences? Why is it interesting?

Generative AI has revolutionized various fields, from creating realistic images and videos to generating human-like text. Two key players in this domain are Neural Processing Units (NPUs) and Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). This article explores their definitions, strengths, weaknesses, applications, comparative benchmarks, cost considerations, and hardware requirements.

ALSO READ: Human vs AI: How Embracing GenAI is Evolving Us into Better Humans


Neural Processing Unit (NPU): An NPU is a specialized hardware accelerator designed specifically to handle neural network computations. NPUs are optimized for tasks such as deep learning inference and training, providing high efficiency and low power consumption. They are increasingly found in mobile devices, edge computing, and emerging AI PCs.

Graphics Processing Unit (GPU): Originally designed for rendering graphics, GPUs are highly parallel processors that excel at handling large-scale, data-intensive computations. Over time, GPUs have been repurposed for AI and machine learning tasks, particularly for training deep learning models due to their massive parallel processing capabilities.

Strengths and Weaknesses: NPU vs GPU


  • Strengths:
    • AI-specific Optimization: NPUs are tailored for neural network tasks, offering superior performance in AI workloads compared to general-purpose CPUs and GPUs.
    • Energy Efficiency: NPUs consume significantly less power, making them ideal for mobile and edge applications where power efficiency is crucial.
    • Low Latency: Designed for real-time AI tasks, NPUs provide lower latency, which is essential for applications like autonomous driving and real-time image processing.
  • Weaknesses:
    • Limited Versatility: NPUs are highly specialized, which means they may not handle non-AI tasks as efficiently as GPUs or CPUs.
    • Development Complexity: Optimizing software for NPUs requires specialized knowledge and tools, potentially increasing development time and costs.


  • Strengths:
    • Parallel Processing Power: GPUs have thousands of cores designed for parallel computation, making them highly effective for training deep learning models and running complex simulations.
    • Versatility: GPUs are versatile and can handle a wide range of tasks beyond AI, including graphics rendering and scientific computations.
    • Established Ecosystem: There is extensive software support for GPUs, with robust frameworks like TensorFlow, PyTorch, and CUDA.
  • Weaknesses:
    • Power Consumption: GPUs consume a lot of power, which can be a drawback for mobile and edge devices.
    • Specialized Use Case: While excellent for parallel tasks, GPUs may not be as efficient for sequential or single-threaded applications.

Example Applications

  • NPUs: Mobile devices for on-device AI tasks (e.g., image recognition, natural language processing), edge devices for real-time data processing (e.g., smart cameras, IoT devices).
  • GPUs: Training large-scale generative models (e.g., GANs, transformers), running AI applications on desktops and servers (e.g., autonomous vehicles, high-performance computing).

Comparative Benchmark

Comparative benchmarks between NPUs and GPUs can vary depending on the specific task and model. Generally:

  • Inference Tasks: NPUs often perform better in terms of efficiency and latency for inference tasks. For example, using NPUs in AI PCs has shown significant performance improvements and reduced power consumption for tasks like real-time video processing and image enhancement.
  • Training Tasks: GPUs typically excel in training large and complex AI models due to their extensive parallel processing capabilities. They can significantly reduce training times, making them the preferred choice for training deep learning models.

Cost Comparison

  • NPUs: Generally more cost-effective for inference tasks and real-time processing on edge devices. The lower power consumption translates into cost savings over time, especially in battery-powered environments.
  • GPUs: While GPUs can be more expensive upfront, they offer excellent performance for a wide range of tasks. Their versatility and established ecosystem often justify the investment, particularly for organizations involved in extensive AI research and development.

Hardware Needed

  • NPUs: Typically integrated into system-on-chips (SoCs) used in mobile devices, embedded systems, and some AI PCs. Examples include Qualcomm’s Snapdragon series with integrated NPUs and Intel’s Core Ultra processors with built-in NPUs.
  • GPUs: Available as discrete cards (e.g., NVIDIA’s GeForce, Quadro, and Tesla series) or integrated into CPUs (e.g., Intel’s Iris Xe). High-end GPUs require robust cooling solutions and sufficient power supply.

Announcements from Key Industry Players: NPU vs GPU

NVIDIA: NVIDIA continues to lead the GPU market with several announcements in 2024. At CES 2024, NVIDIA unveiled the GeForce RTX 40 SUPER Series, which includes enhancements specifically designed for generative AI tasks. The new GPUs, such as the RTX 4080 SUPER, offer significant performance improvements and efficiency gains, supporting advanced generative AI applications like Stable Diffusion and AI-enhanced video creation tools. NVIDIA’s RTX Remix, an open beta tool, allows modders to remaster classic games using AI-generated textures, ray tracing, and other advanced features​ (NVIDIA)​​ (NVIDIA Blog)​.

NVIDIA’s CEO Jensen Huang emphasized the importance of generative AI, announcing new AI supercomputers and infrastructure designed to handle trillion-parameter models. The NVIDIA DGX SuperPOD, powered by the Blackwell architecture, provides unprecedented AI training and inference performance, making it a cornerstone for future AI development​ (NVIDIA Blog)​​ (NVIDIA Blog)​.

Intel: Intel has also made significant strides with its NPU technology. The Intel NPU Acceleration Library, compatible with the new Intel Core Ultra processors, allows developers to optimize AI models for NPU performance. This library aims to enhance the efficiency of AI applications running on Intel’s NPUs, making it a critical tool for developers focusing on on-device AI tasks​ (TECHCOMMUNITY.MICROSOFT.COM)​.

Qualcomm: Qualcomm continues to integrate NPUs into its Snapdragon processors, enabling advanced AI capabilities in mobile and edge devices. Qualcomm’s latest NPUs offer high TOPS (trillions of operations per second) performance, making them suitable for real-time AI applications and enhancing the capabilities of devices ranging from smartphones to autonomous systems​ (Qualcomm Tech & Innovation)​​ (Qualcomm Tech & Innovation)​.

Conclusion: My Opinion on NPU vs. GPU for Generative AI

Although NPUs are an exciting development in the realm of generative AI, it’s unfortunate that there are currently no widely available real-world applications that allow for a direct performance and cost comparison with GPUs.

For end-user applications, GPUs have established their dominance. With GPU-based tools, I can generate images using ComfyUI and SDXL models, synthesize voices using Bark or Edge Text-to-Speech, create videos and animations with Stable Video Diffusion or AnimateDiff, and run offline LLMs like Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 or Noromaid 20B v0.1.1. All these applications utilize GPU power effectively.

In contrast, there are no comparable NPU-based applications available at the moment to test and evaluate. Thus, any claims about NPU performance and relevance remain theoretical.

However, GPU performance in generative AI is not without its limitations. For instance, using an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super, generating a 2K resolution image (2048×2048) takes approximately 135-175 seconds. Creating a 2-second video at 1024×576 resolution and 14 fps requires around 360 seconds (6 minutes). While my GPU is slightly outdated, it is still a decent performer for gaming in 2024. Additionally, GPU prices continue to rise, making cost another critical consideration.

If NPUs can provide better performance or lower costs in the near future, they could become a viable alternative for generative AI applications. This competition could also push the GPU-based ecosystem to improve and optimize further.

Only time will tell how these technologies will evolve, but the potential for NPUs to impact the generative AI landscape is promising. Let’s see what the future holds.

Yabes Elia

Yabes Elia

An empath, a jolly writer, a patient reader & listener, a data observer, and a stoic mentor

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.